Saturday, April 13, 2013

The rise of Chinese venture capital (part 3 of 5) ? The Berkeley Blog

Steve Blank, lecturer, Haas School of Business | 4/12/13 | Steve Blank

I just spent a few weeks in Japan and China on a book tour for the?Japanese?andChinese?versions of the Startup Owners Manual.? In this series of 5 posts, I thought I?d share what I learned in China. All the usual caveats apply. I was only in China for a week so this a cursory view. Thanks to?Kai-Fu Lee?of Innovation Works, David Lin of Microsoft Accelerator, Frank Hawke of the?Stanford Center in Beijing,?and my publisher China Machine Press.

China speaking 2

The first post described how China built a science and technology infrastructure?to support advanced weapons systems development. The previous post described?how the Torch program built China?s innovation clusters. This post is about the rise of Chinese venture capital and how it helped build the countries entrepreneurial ecosystem.

The Rise of Chinese venture capital

China?s move away from a state system that solely depended on a command and control economy started in the 1990s.?The first wave of startups?began when R&D centers and universities began to provide the technology and seed capital for new startups that were spin-outs or spin-offs. This could be a group of individuals leaving a university or research center or an entire department leaving. For example, in the 1990?s 85% of the start-up funds of the new technology companies founded in Beijing came from the research center or university they left.

China Startup Funding

The second wave of technology investors were Chinese banks, who provided the majority of the later stage investments in the Torch Program. By 1991, 70% of the Torch funded startups were getting bank financing for expansion and later stages of the new ventures, with local governments acting as guarantors. Like the U.S. SBIR and STTR programs, the Torch Program?s funding for new ventures was limited to seed funding the front end. Being designated as a Torch Program startup gave banks comfort to provide loans to these ventures for technology commercialization.

Technology zones with Science and Technology Industrial Parks were the third source of support for new ventures. Inside the zones were Torch Technology Business Incubators?with startups licensed by the local governments.? These local governments financially supported the startups because, by locating in these zones, the new ventures were seen as contributing to local economic development. This helped the startups qualify for funding from banks and venture capital firms.

By the mid-1990s, Chinese leaders realized that the Torch program couldn?t be the source of all capital for startups. At the same time neither banks nor local governments had the cash to finance startups on the scale the country needed. The problem was that in China the government didn?t recognize venture capital firms as a legitimate organizational type. The founding of domestic VC firms began with the establishment of local government-financed venture capital firms (GVCFs), followed by university-backed VC firms (UVCFs). (The State Science and Technology Commission and the Ministry of Finance formed the China New Technology Venture Investment Corporation in 1986, but it was a government agency supporting national technology venture policy objectives, rather than a profit-oriented private enterprise. It went bankrupt in 1997.)

A few foreign VC firms like IDG Capital Partners entered China in the early 1990s. Gradually, from the mid-1990s, the perception of venture capital shifted from its being a type of government funding to being a commercial activity necessary to support the commercialization of new technology. But it wasn?t until 1998 that corporate-backed VC firms could be established, and that started a wave of VC funds backed by government, corporate and foreign capital.

A great summary diagram below from OECD?s?Report on China?s Innovation Policy?traces the evolution of China?s Innovation Ecosystem.

Evolution of China's Innovation Ecosystem

Investing in China today

Fast forward a decade, today the Private Equity and Venture Capital business is booming in China with over 1000 firms actively investing. Most of the early deals were done by offshore venture funds ? with their fund registered in countries outside China and using dollars. The latest trends are as?Renminbi?(?RMB?) funds (the Renminbi is the official currency in China.)

In the past, foreign funds who wanted to invest in China had to set up funds using dollars with complicated offshore structures with exits through offshore listings. The Renminbi funds have fewer restrictions on what industries the fund can invest in, less regulatory oversight and access to listing a portfolio company in China. There are two types of Renminbi funds: domestic funds and foreign-invested funds.? Domestic Renminbi funds are fully owned by Chinese investors, while foreign-invested Renminbi funds may be partially or fully owned by non-Chinese investors.? Both types of funds are organized under Chinese law and use Renminbi to invest in Chinese companies.

The other big change was the creation of ChiNext, China?s equivalent of NASDAQ stock exchange for start-ups, in 2009. The market was created to provide startups and their investors liquidity. Over 100 startups were listed on ChiNext the first year of its launch at sky-high valuations (average of 66 times earnings.) About 60% of the startups listed on ChiNext were backed by Renminbi funds, making the investors of these funds one of the main beneficiaries of the exchange.

The next posts,?Part 4 ?Zhongguancun in Beijing?? China?s Silicon Valley and?part 5, the Gold Rush and Fire Extinguishers,?describe the Beijing entrepreneurship ecosystem.

Lessons learned

  • China?s venture capital system has made a remarkable journey from the ?state owns everything? to the free market
  • It?s done it in a series of evolutionary stages, each new one learning from the last.

Source: http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2013/04/12/the-rise-of-chinese-venture-capital-part-3-of-5/

Paige Butcher David Petraeus Petraeus Mia Love wall street journal us map Electoral Map

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.